This a traditional letter column.
You are encouraged to write a letter of comment on anything that you
find worthy of comment. It will (may) be published in this column along
with my reply. As editor I reserve the right to delete material;
however I will not alter the undeleted material. E-mail to me that solely
references the contents of this site will be assumed to be publishable
mail. All other e-mail is assumed to be private. And, of course, anything
marked not for publication is not for publication. Oh yes, letters of
appreciation for the scholarly resources provided by this site will be
handled very discreetly. This page contains the correspondence for
March 2002.
From: Charles Hitchcock
According to Catholic mythology that trick works only with patent
leather, which I wouldn’t expect in $300 shoes….
… continued on next rock …
I thought the point about patent leather shoes was that they were
unnaturally shiny….
From: johnwford
Dear Richard;
From: Charles Hitchcock
Have you been following ANSIBLE? Moorcock was talking about
auctioning a couple of amputated gangrenous toes as relics;
perhaps authors could do the same with fat? (I’ll say it for
you — “supply is no problem, there are plenty of fatheads
in SF.”)
I am quite sure that I do not want to know what sort of person would
purchase a Moorcock gangreous toe as a relic.
From: Charles Hitchcock
Do you read Charlotte MacLeod? The Peter Shandy mystery series
started with an excessive set of Xmas lights….
… continued on next rock …
A set that requires running an additional electric feed from the local
line to the house, for instance. (Although it isn’t just lights; power
was also needed for the motors for the animated displays and the
sound system that can be heard throughout the faculty crescent.)]
Index of contributors
Other Correspondence Pages
Date: 06/07/2002
Subj: Giorgio
I dunno, the thing with $300 shoes may be that you shine them up to be
even shinier than patent leather shoes.
(And then there’s the idiot assistant principal in California(?) who
recently got fired for making the girls coming into a prom show that
they were wearing “decent” panties instead of thongs….)
Was he being respectable and checking by touch rather than by looking?
You may well be right. Still, in the days when I spit shined shoes, I
could put a mirror finish on them. Which reminds me – in the Georgette
Heyer novels, gentlemen prided themselves on their shining boots. The
secret ingredient used in the superior shine is often suspected of being
champagne. All things considered, it was more likely to have been gin.
No. She was requiring the girls to show (i.e., expose — and not in
private) what they were wearing. (This sounds incredible, but it’s
certainly more than the typical urban myth — the story in the GLOBE
had names and quotes; the NEW YORK TIMES has a summary identifying the
school and the vice principal, although they’re quoting “reports”.)
It’s the sort of thing that has to be true because it is too inane to be made
up. Maybe she just thought she was being considerate to the girl’s dates.
Return to index of contributors
Date: 05/08/2002
Subj: Your site
I just found your site and am enjoy the humor section very much,
thank you for the laughs.
—an Old Seadog–
I’m glad you like it. The URL will probably change in the next few
days – I will let you know what the changed URL is.
Return to index of contributors
Date: 05/15/2002
Subj: May editorial (where’s the fat?)
All of which brings up thoughts of liposuction of the brain, which in
turn brings up the movie version of Starship Troopers. If we run out
of fatheads in SF, we can always make do with directors. Don’t even
think of Hannibal Lector.
Return to index of contributors
Date: 05/15/2002
Subj: May editorial (lights)
No such luck; I’ve never read her stuff. I am puzzled though. How
can there be an excessive set of Xmas lights?
Now that you mention it I remember reading somewhere about a Texan
suburb where people hired lighting display consultants for setting up
their outdoor lighting. Someone who merely put up a string of lights
were looked upon as the equivalent of chaps who have rusted out
Ford Fairlaines in their front yard.
The Peter Shandy stories are worth reading in small doses —
lightweights set at a rural agricultural college somewhere in New
England. (The Max&Sarah; mysteries are also entertaining, if you like
to snicker at pompously ingrown New England families.)
As to pompously ingrown New England families it is always a decision
whether to snicker or to cluck pityingly.
Return to index of contributors
This page was last updated June 19, 2002.
It was reformatted and moved November 29, 2005.